How much do you call for to spend to get the most out of your games at 4 K ? There ’s no such matter as a unfeigned budget choice , but theRadeon RX 9070 XTis — at the mo — your good , most cost - effective recourse . At $ 600 , this artwork card is so hearty for achieving playable framerates at max configurations and 4 K , it ’s almost enough to make you forget aboutDLSS 4 ’s and Nvidia ’s oft - brag multi - frame gen … almost .
AMD ’s fast-growing pricing gives two competing products a punch in the gut . One of those is theNvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at $ 750 MSRP , or the expected al-Qaida price . The other is AMD ’s own $ 550 Radeon RX 9070 ( our review is come soon ) . If the RX 9070 is theorize to be tantamount in performance toNvidia ’s $ 550 RTX 5070 , then the surplus $ 50 for the XT is a no - brainer for any microcomputer gamer who wants juggle more hard-core , 4 1000 play scenario on desktop . The RTX 5070 Ti may have the border in some plot , but that hardly weigh whenstock issueshave put that card above $ 800 or — in some case — even close to $ 1,000 .
The RX 9070 XT ’s strength all depend on whether AMD can see need . If line entertain , the scalper do n’t overwhelm provision , and you could find one at MSRP , it ’s easily one of the best bang - for - buck pick available this year . It may not be as tacky as a newNvidia RTX 5080 Founders Edition , but you should n’t postulate to pay over $ 1,000 to play your plot at 4K. If AMD is right about one matter , it ’s that the focus of the market should be on mid - range GPUs , not those at the top death .
© Photo: Adriano Contreras / Gizmodo
That does n’t have in mind there are n’t matter . On a technical level , I had several problem run games with the prerelease edition of AMD ’s drivers and its Adrenalin software . I also experience around the bend visuals , frame hitching , and occasional crashes in some games that I did not experience on Nvidia ’s belated cards , even with Team Green ’s beta drivers . Those board have their own litany of issues — bothintendedandunintended — so I ’m not implying AMD is the only one with drawback . I test the AMD GPUs on a system with an Intel CPU . I surmise AMD will play nicer with AMD ’s buffalo chip , but that ’s no alibi .
With its rough edges sandpaper off , I can envisage the Radeon RX 9070 XT as the sleeper hit of the GPU release season . And I desire its a sleeper hit , since , if it gets too popular , we may have yet another stock SNAFU to yammer about .
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT Shows Us That $50 Can Make a World of Difference
For review article , AMD send Gizmodo theXFX Swift AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT . It ’s a sleek - seem , three - fan calling card whose esthetical is aided by an angled sharpness that made it appear like a mini skyscraper inside my test PC . It is also a big , big bill . XFX ’s adaptation of the XT is a 3.5 slot GPU , signify it takes up enough room on my PC ’s motherboard to take out an entire PCIe slot . I would intimate you take a look at various GPUs from the full stove of OEMs ( AMD partner with a variety of card shaper ) to make indisputable your personal computer type has enough room for both your new graphics card and additional drives you design to slot in .
Both the RX 9070 and 9070 XT include 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 644.6 GB / s bandwidth . Both carte are based on the novel RDNA 4 architecture . This is compared to Nvidia ’s Blackwell of the RTX 50 - serial , which is a embrasure of the company ’s AI training chip architecture . RDNA is made up of compute units , though these have been redesign for the new graphic hardware compared to past cards like the Radeon RX 7900 series . These new units should support eminent clock speeds than RDNA 3 , and they should be more power effective to boot .
Both the 9070 and 9070 crosstalk employment on a PCIe 5.0 bus , though the more expensive card ups its encouragement clock velocity to 2.9 GHz . Despite housing the same retentiveness , AMD ’s two latest nontextual matter cards are very different in most agency that matter . The $ 600 graphics board has 64 compute units versus the 9070 ’s 56 . That shows up in benchmarks , where the RX 9070 XT find sizable uptick in in writing and AI public presentation . Good affair , then , that the capabilities of this card are just enough to make it well-nigh ideal for 4 K play at a budget .
© Photo: Adriano Contreras / Gizmodo
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT Manages Solid Framerates for 4K
For $ 600 , there ’s simply no comparability in performance between other GPUs for dally games at 4K. It ’s sure as shooting good than the $ 550 AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE from 2023 , but more than that , it screak out playable framerates at or above the $ 750 Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti . I tested the card on anOrigin PC Neuron 3500Xconfig with an Intel Core Ultra 9 285 K CPU and 32 GB of DDR5 , 6400 MT / s RAM . It ’s the same PC I used to test all the Nvidia card , so if you ’re looking to see how well AMD does combined with Intel ’s former , keep read .
semisynthetic benchmark like 3D Mark do n’t give us a good idea of actual in - game performance , though it exhibit us what the hardware is capable of . In that way , RDNA 4 is amazingly versatile . In our tests with three-D Mark Steel Nomad , the RX 9070 XT score a little less than 200 point above the RTX 5070 Ti . The same ca n’t be said for the board in tests that demand improved ray tracing performance . It scored 1,260 point unfit in 3-D Mark Port Royal and about 1,535 points bad in 3D Mark Speed Way . For AI performance , the RX 9070 XT pull off to get a quantified score of 26645 in Geekbench AI , more than the RTX 5070 Ti ’s 22022 .
In our bench mark withCyberpunk 2077 , the RX 9070 XT handle to effectively match the RTX 5070 Ti ’s performance across our 4 K tests without FSR , and managed similar resultant comparing DLSS 4 and FSR 4 . It was a few frames timid of the 5070 Ti ’s carrying out at 1080p , but it was still fully playable disregardless . InHorizon Zero Dawn : Remastered , AMD ’s $ 600 GPU top Nvidia ’s sub - premium graphics card by a bare few percentage points , with or without AI upscaling at both 1080p and 4K.
© Photo: Adriano Contreras / Gizmodo
It ’s not all good news . A game likeBlack Myth : Wukongnotoriously play worse with AMD cards than Nvidia ’s , and that remain true even when enabling FSR . At the highest preferences and 4 K , I could n’t do to cave in 25 FPS with AMD ’s upscaling , whereas the 5070 Ti could dispatch 52 FPS on average in benchmarks .
get ’s ignore motionless bench mark for a moment and analyze the RX 9070 XT by how it does in recent games . InAvowed , playing in the most intensive region — the Emerald Stair — I was averaging 50 to 53 FPS at 4 K and extremist options . InKingdom Come : Deliverance II , I was sit at around 55 FPS during the game ’s opening siege without FSR . With upscaling , I was getting around 80 FPS .
There were some games that performed even better than Nvidia ’s a la mode . Marvel ’s Spider - Man 2was an excellent experience at 4 K , managing above 60 FPS despite the wild swings in carrying into action typical of that game . I could not rival that with either the RTX 5070 or RTX 5070 Ti . It ’s as amazing as Peter Parker and Miles Morales themselves .
© Photo: Adriano Contreras / Gizmodo
Then come other issues that made some titles unplayable . I go through unattackable performance inHogwarts Legacy , only to get random drops in FPS for no verse or rationality , whether out of doors or indoors . I also had a very glitchy time trying to playDragon Age : The Veilguardthanks to uninterrupted skeleton hitching that made the opening area of the secret plan unplayable . The problem I encountered were only in a select few rubric , and I chalk them up to a driver issue . Still , AMD did n’t offer me an idea what the exit may be in metre for this follow-up . We ’ll be sure to check back to see if these issues get resolved in non - beta equipment driver .
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT Could Use More FSR 4 Support
AMD ’s latest release not only want to compete with Nvidia on specs and rendering performance , but it ask to remove back against Nvidia ’s upscaling technical school . The answer is FSR 4 , AKA FidelityFX Super Resolution . The new version of AMD ’s upscaling tech is exclusive to the RDNA 4 cards , since it uses the GPU ’s new AI accelerators broil into the architecture . This is supposed to offer less artifacting , less ghosting , and higher details for each upscaled skeleton .
The difference between running games with FSR 2 and FSR 3 is stark . The uplift in a FSR 2 - supported game likeAlan Wake IIis many times less impressive than on a secret plan likeMarvel ’s Spider - Man 2 . For the latter , FSR 4 on balanced configurations was how I could get it to play at 4 thousand , radical configurations , and re trace turned up to high scope at or above 60 FPS . That was something I struggled to do on Nvidia ’s latest computer graphic cards .
While FSR 3.1 and earlier models were far more ironware - agnostic , FSR 4 reckon on RDNA 4 . In that fashion , it ’s now a verbatim rival with the exclusive nature of Nvidia ’s DLSS models . in the first place AMD Radeon cards wo n’t get accession to FSR 4 , either . The problem is , presently there are just over 30 plot that confirm FSR 4 . There are some big - name titles in there , likeCall of Duty : Black Ops 6andWarhammer 40 K : Space Marine 2 , but the list is small compared to the around 75 games that supported DLSS 4 at launching . Nvidia has been adding more and more support to plot over that time .
© Photo: Adriano Contreras / Gizmodo
FSR financial backing can be the make - or - break between whether a secret plan is truly playable or not . Depending on what you were look to play at max context and 4 K , owning a AMD or Nvidia GPU could be the difference between getting playable framerates or not .
AMD Isn’t Releasing Its Own Multi-Frame Gen Any Time Soon
AMD has say it has “ prove ” a multi - frame gen theoretical account but that it does n’t discover it practical and that player do n’t see a pauperism for it . While Nvidia has sure enough gone out of its way to puff up the idea of “ simulated ” frames as the future of gambling , multi - framing gen is still a capital way for gamers with less - expensive PC to make the most of their high - refresh rate monitor . DLSS — and FSR frame gen for that thing — work best when you ’re at or near 60 FPS already . That ’s why the RTX 5070 proved a dashing hopes . It simply does n’t satisfy the needs of gamers who desire to represent at 4K. However , it ’s more than capable of hitting solid framerates at 1440p . There ’s a unbalanced frisson of using DLSS 4 to promote 60 or 70 FPS to 150 or higher . You wo n’t get that with AMD ’s later GPUs .
AMD ’s graphics card costs $ 50 more than the RTX 5070 and the RX 9070 at its base price , effectively make both those cards superfluous in one fell swoop . Then the motion is , whether to get the RTX 5070 Ti or the RX 9070 XT ? Well , it may simply come down to availability . We wo n’t know what time has in fund for AMD ’s latest , but we can state that unless something drastic materialise , Nvidia ’s GPUs will go on to put up from inflated terms and stock issue .
If you ’re gun for a young GPU now , and you ca n’t wait for Nvidia ’s stock woefulness to end , the RX 9070 XT is n’t just a makeshift — it ’s the 4 K raise you wanted . Will you miss out on DLSS 4 and the potential to do over 100 FPS in some games ? Yes , you will . At a $ 150 to $ 300 discount equate to high-flown GeForce cost , that sounds like a fair trade .
AMDNvidiaNvidia GeForce RTX 50 - serial publication
Daily Newsletter
Get the estimable tech , science , and culture news in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , delivered to your present .