When you purchase through links on our site , we may earn an affiliate mission . Here ’s how it works .
WASHINGTON — In skill fiction , there ’s no shortage of type who are heighten with some form of machinery . Tony Stark , aka Iron Man , wear an electromagnetic equipment inside his chest that keeps him live and power his metal suits . When Star Wars ' Luke Skywalker lost his hand in a lightsaber battle , he cursorily exchange it with a mechanical hand that work just like the original — and looked just like it , too . And in the 2015 film " Mad Max : Fury Road , " Imperator Furiosa sports a dangerous - looking metallic element prosthetic arm that appears to have been assembled from bit of power tool , and which she uses to cement her reputation as a ruthless fighter .
Even in the real world , technology enables mechanical reconstruction and modification of the human eubstance , from prosthetic limbs and pacesetter to brain - computer interfaces and antifertility implants .
With technology offering a growing list of opportunities for sophisticated enhancement of our bodies, could we become less than human?
But are there limits to technological " upgrade " to our bodies , and at what point do we just check being human , and become … something else ? [ Bionic human : Top 10 Technologies ]
Using technology to improve what the body can do dates back to when humans ' remote ancestors craftedthe first toolsout of rocks , Suveen Mathaudhu , an assistant professor with the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of California in Riverside , say here during a panel on June 16 at the Future Con fete , where science and technology intersect with skill fable .
Ever since early mankind craft those stone tools , using technology to heighten our lifelike ability has frequently made our living better — and has also raised honorable concerns along the room about how people might be negatively affected by trust too much on mechanically skillful sweetening , Mathaudhu said .
Suveen Mathaudhu, Tim Brown, Katherine Pratt and Dan Cosley offered insights at the Future Con panel “The Human-Technology Frontier: To Enhancement and Beyond” on June 16.
Building a better human
skill - fiction interfaces between human being and machines take many form — there are interaction that archive and replay experiences in a path that connects flat with the brain to access emotion and the weed , and conveyance drug user toan alternate reality . Some sweetening help users regain a lost function , such as a wanting or damage limb or sensory experience . Then there are the modifications that amplify abilities , which are more technologically workable than one might expect , panel extremity Dan Cosley , a program director for Computer and Information Science and Engineering ( CISE ) at the National Science Foundation ( NSF ) , tell the audience .
In fact , researcher have already developedrobotic exosuitsthat help wearer carry enceinte lode and economize energy while walking long distances . One inventor even designed an exosuit that enabled himto hover — yes , just like Iron Man . [ Real - Life Iron Man Takes Flight | television ]
In some example , engineering already in use can do unbelievable things , but researchers are still investigating — and defining — its abilities and limitations , panellist Katherine Pratt , a University of Washington doctorial prospect with the Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering , an engineering research center fund by the NSF , said at Future Con .
Researchers presently usefunctional magnetic sonorousness imaging(fMRI ) to capture image of neuronic bodily process in real clip . But whena 2009 studygenerated fMRI figure depict brain action in dead salmon , scientists called into motion whether fMRI result were altogether reliable , Pratt said .
And then there ’s the question of who will own and verify the data collected — and broadcast — by biologically integrated mechanism such as pacemaker or defibrillators , which raise worry about personal privacy , she bestow .
Suveen Mathaudhu , Tim Brown , Katherine Pratt and Dan Cosley offered insights at the Future Con panel " The Human - Technology Frontier : To Enhancement and Beyond " on June 16 . recognition : M. Weisberger / Live Science
As technology moves forward , engineers and researchers should not lose raft of what mass actually need and require from their enhancements , control panel member and neuroethicist Tim Brown , a University of Washington doctorial candidate at CSNE ’s Neuroethics Thrust , differentiate the Future Con audience .
For example , in a recent focus radical of people with spinal corduroy injuries , participants said that when it came to technical enhancement , they wanted sound wheelchair — not exoskeleton , Brown said .
In fact , one of the nidus group player literally had skeleton in the cupboard in his closet — a defunct collection of exoskeletons that he ’d tested and discarded , according to Brown , who studies the value orientation of neural applied science and engineering . Whileexoskeleton designmay intrigue locomotive engineer , wheelchair are often plainly the more hardheaded solution for routine utilization , he add .
But perhaps the question that looms large is this : At what point do artificial sweetening cease to merely improve human abilities and commence to outbalance our intrinsic man ? Daleks , the scoundrel of the BBC television show " Doctor Who , " are little more than a blobby stack of frame and a brain enclosed in an armored eggshell , Mathaudhu said at the control panel . If man were to reach that level of mechanically skillful " sweetening , " would we still be human ?
To answer that , we may need to considerwhat it means to be human — and who gets to decide that , the panelists said .
Maybe " human " is plainly too binary a term , and humanity should rather be defined along a spectrum , Cosley enunciate . And from a sociological perspective , the connections , interaction and relationships form between individuals also inform what we are as a species , the panelists added . In the foresightful discharge , these less touchable factors may count as much as , or more than , the canonical biologic structures and functions that can be enhance or replaced totally by machines , the panelists say .
Original clause onLive Science .
