In the nineteenth century , city were grimy position , where thousands of people last in overcrowded tenement building and walked streetspollutedwith trash , sewage , and thecarcassesofdead creature . Unsurprisingly , these cities were also hotbeds of infectious disease .

One of the direct causes of demise wastuberculosis , which spreads from person to person in the tiny droplets that spray through the gentle wind when an infected mortal coughs or sneezes . " In the 19th century , TB [ was ] the greatest single cause of death among New Yorkers , " explains Anne Garner , the conservator of rare rule book and manuscripts at the New York Academy of MedicineLibraryand the co - curator of the Museum of the City of New York ’s newexhibition , " Germ City : Microbes and the Metropolis . "

In the 19th century , tuberculosis kill one inevery sevenpeople in Europe and the U.S. , and it was particularly deadly for city dwellers . Between 1810 and 1815 , the disease — then commonly known as pulmonary tuberculosis , or the blank plague — was to charge for more than a quartern of the register deaths in New York City . While New York was n’t alone among urban nub in have startlingly high rates of T.B. , its quest to eliminate the disease was pioneering : It became the first U.S. city to ban spitting .

A Dr. Dettweiler sputum flask, circa 1910

“BEWARE THE CARELESS SPITTER”

In 1882 , Robert Koch became the first to find the cause of T.B. : a bacterium later namedMycobacterium T.B. , which he isolated from samples taken from infected animals . ( Koch won the Nobel Prize in 1905 for his oeuvre . ) He determined that the disease was disseminate through bacteria - infected sputum , the mix of phlegm and tongue coughed up during a respiratory infection . That meant that rampant public spit — often referred to as expectorating — was circulate the disease .

In 1896 , in response to the growing understanding of the threat to public wellness , New York City became the first American urban center to ban spitting on sidewalk , the floors in public buildings , and on public theodolite , yield officials the ability to slap perverse spitter with a fine or a jail sentence . Over the next 15 years , almost 150 other U.S. cities trace case and banned public expectoration [ PDF ] .

The New York City health department and private groups like the National Tuberculosis Association , the Women ’s Health Protective Association , and the Brooklyn Anti - Tuberculosis Committee generated anti - spittingsloganssuch as " Spitting Is Dangerous , Indecent , and Against the Law , " " mind the Careless Spitter , " and " No Spit , No economic consumption . " They madepostersdecrying spitting ( amongotherunhealthy substance abuse ) and cue hoi polloi of the ban . member of the public wereencouragedto face defiant spitter , or , at the very least , give them the stink oculus . While there were many other factors to blame for the spread of tuberculosis — like perilously overcrowded , ill vent tenement housing and widespreadmalnutrition — public spitters became the literal poster nestling of infection .

Tuberculosis warnings from the Committee on Prevention of Tuberculosis that appeared on New York City streetcar transfers in 1908, reprinted by the Michigan Board of Health in 1909

New York City officials followed through on the scourge of punitory activity for errant spitters . More than 2500 masses were arrested under the legislative act between 1896 and 1910 , though most only meet a small fine — on average , less than $ 1 ( in 1896 , that was the eq of about $ 30 today ) . Few other cities were as attached to enforcing their phlegm - related laws as New York was . In 1910 , the National Tuberculosis Associationreportedthat less than half of urban center with anti - spitting regulations on the books had actually made any arrests .

Despite the constabulary , the problem remain intractable in New York . Spitting in streetcars flummox a particularly far-flung , and disgusting , issue : Men would spit straight onto the story of the enclosed car , where pool of phlegm would gain . woman fall apart long dresses were at risk of nibble up phlegm on their hemline wherever they cash in one’s chips . And the constabulary did n’t seem to block off most spitters . As one sick trolley passenger write ina letterto the editor program ofThe New York Timesin 1903 , “ That the law is ignored is evident to every passenger upon these public transport : that it is maliciously violated would not in some cases be too strong an asseveration . ”

The situation was n’t much better two decade later , either . “ Expectorating on the sidewalks and in public places is probably the superlative menace to health with which we have to argue , ” New York City Mayor John Francis Hylansaidin a 1920 appeal for citizen to help clean up the city streets .

Article image

THE BLUE HENRY

spew law were n’t the only agency that health authorization tried to rein in the spread of TB at the turn of the 100 . Anti - tuberculosis effort of the time also featured their own accessory : the phlegm bottleful .

Faced with the fact that sick masses would cough up phlegm no matter what a poster in a streetcar told them , in the late nineteenth century , doctor and health authority all over the world began instructing the great unwashed with tuberculosis to spit into pocket - sized container , then deport it around with them . “ A person with tuberculosis must never spit out on the trading floor or pavement or in street gondola , but always into a cuspidor or into a newspaper cup , which he should have with him at all meter , and which can be burned,”advisedthe New York City Department of Health ’s 1908 publicationDo Not Spit : Tuberculosis ( Consumption ) Catechism and Primer for School Children . These containers were known as spittoon , spittoons , or simply sputum cupful or phlegm bottles .

Among the most well - known of these sputum - carrying receptacle was the “ Blue Henry , ” a air hole flaskful made of atomic number 27 - patrician glass that was originally fabricate by the German loony bin pioneer Peter Dettweiler , who himself had suffer from tuberculosis .

An  that ran in the Journal of Outdoor Life—which billed itself as “the anti-tuberculosis magazine"—in 1915

“ The sputum bottleful was like a portable flask that could be used to collect this mucilaginous phlegm that was produce by the irritated lungs of a soul suffering from tuberculosis , ” Garner sound out . While they came invarious shapes , sizes , and material , the fancier adaptation would have a spring - loaded palpebra and could be opened from both side , so that you could pitter-patter into a funnel shape - like opening on one side and then unscrew the bottleful to clean out the phlegm receptacle later .

Dettweiler ’s twist and thesimilar devicesthat followed became popular all over the world as doctors and government sought to contain the spread of TB . These receptacles became a secureness in infirmary and at sanatoriums where TB patient went to go back , and were a common bridge player - out from anti - tuberculosis charities that worked with TB - smite patients .

In the early 1900s , the New York Charity Organization Society was one of them . Its Committee for the Prevention of Tuberculosis raised money to buy its New York City - base client better food , new bed , and of grade , phlegm cups . ( in all likelihood the theme kind , rather than the glass Dettweiler flasks . ) The generousness was n’t categoric , though . The society would potentially perpetrate its aid if charity proletarian show up for a surprisal dwelling house review to discover unsanitary condition , like brim over sputum cup that were not being properly disinfected [ PDF ] .

finally , the city itself began handing out sputum cup . In an effort to quash the contagion , by 1916 a big numberof cities — such as Los Angeles , Seattle , and Boston — consecrate part of their municipal budgets to pay for tuberculosis supplies like paper sputum cups that would be handed out to the public for free .

Though paper sputum cup could be burned , glass or alloy flasks had to be cleaned on a regular basis . Doctors recommended that the sputum bottles contain a strong disinfectant that could vote down off the tuberculosis bacilli , and that the receptacles be clean anddisinfectedevery morning and even by rinsing them with a lye solution and boiling them in water . As for the sputum itself , burn was the preferable method acting of sanitizing anything contaminated with TB at the time , and phlegm was no exception — although rural consumptives wereencouragedto bury it in the garden if burning was n’t practical .

In an era where infective disease was often associate with poor , immigrant community of interests , sputum bottles made it possible to go out in public without drawing the sameattentionto your condition that cut up up languor into the street would . “ You could discreetly carry them around and then take them out and people would n’t inevitably bang that you were suffering from the disease , ” Garner explains . Or at least , moderately discretely , since they presently became widely associated with lunger . A Dr. Greeley , for one , contend that average sputum bottles were “ so blatant as to be objectionable , " andsuggestedpeople expectoration into toilet newspaper and put that in a pouch or else . That approximation did n’t quite take off .

And while hide your infectious position is not dependable for public health , the sputum flasks did lower the risk that you were infecting the people around you as you coughed and sneezed . “ As long as you were doing it into the bottle , you probably were not infecting other people , ” Garner says .

Not many of these sputum bottles have survived , in part because it was standard practice to burn everything in a tuberculosis affected role ’s room after they died to prevent germ from spread . Those that continue are now gatherer ’s items , held in the archive of institute like Australia’sMuseums Victoria ; theMuseum of Health Carein Kingston , Canada ; and the New York Academy of Medicine Library .

TUBERCULOSIS TODAY

Unfortunately , neither anti - spitting propaganda nor sputum flask managed to arrest the spread of tuberculosis . veridical relief from the disease did n’t come until 1943 , when biochemist Selman Waksman discovered that streptomycin , isolated from a microbe find in territory , could be an in effect antibiotic drug for tuberculosis . ( He won theNobel Prizefor it , 47 twelvemonth after Koch won his . )

And while carrying a cute flask to ptyalize your disease - ridden flatness into sounds quaint now , tuberculosis is n’t a relic of the past . Even with aesculapian progress , it has never been exterminate . It remain one of the most devastating infectious agents in the domain , and kills more than a million hoi polloi worldwide every year — the accurate number isdebated , but could be as high-pitched as 1.8 million . And , like manyinfectious diseases , it is evolving to becomeantibiotic resistant .

Sputum flasks could come in back into mode yet .